It's bizarre—my laptop suddenly thinks I'm in Washington, D.C., right next to the NSA headquarters. Coincidence? Possibly. But the timing is eerie. This happened right after I published articles on U.S. foreign policy, Israel-Palestine, Iran, Denmark, and the unspoken layers behind "Project Israel." In addition to that, I have been targeted by sophisticated social engineering attacks and phishing attempts.
The West celebrates freedom of speech—until that speech questions certain narratives. At that point, algorithms, surveillance, and "content policy violations" appear out of thin air. The question is simple: who decides what is "offensive" and what is just a valid critique?
Mark Zuckerberg
Mark Zuckerberg's personal background shouldn't matter—but why is Facebook's moderation so one-sided?
Zuckerberg being Jewish should be irrelevant in any discussion—unless moderation practices on Facebook appear to systematically favor one geopolitical interest. Users who speak out against Israeli policy or advocate for Palestinian rights routinely report having their posts removed or restricted. At the same time, violent rhetoric targeting Arabs, Muslims, or members of Israel's military propaganda machine is often left untouched. The moderation bias is not about identity—it’s about systemic imbalance and opaque decision-making.
Shira Anderson, ex-IDF soldier, dictates AI Policies!
Shira Anderson, an American international rights lawyer, served as Meta's Head of AI Policy for over 4 years! She
recently joined OpenAI. In 2009, she voluntarily enlisted in the IDF under a program designed for foreign nationals.
Her role at Meta involves shaping AI and content moderation policies.
This is what she has written in her bio on LinkedIn:
AI? Israel? Animals? International Humanitarian Law? Women's health? I have thoughts. Ask me.
Remember, she worked for the IDF, where Israelis call Palestinians Animals, to dehumanize them! As you see in this video, even Israel's "Defence Minister", Yoav Gallant, publicly calls everyone in Gaza "human animals" in defence of the complete siege on the city of Gaza!
Additionally, recently, Meta employed over 100 individuals with prior experience in the Israeli military and intelligence services, including veterans from Unit 8200, Israel's elite cyber intelligence unit.
This is a massive conflict of interest when you consider that these systems are flagging political content about Israel. Can anyone pretend this doesn't affect neutrality? Platforms shaping global discourse should not be guided by national security alumni from any state involved in active military occupation.
TikTok
U.S. officials claim TikTok is a "national security threat." But is the real threat that it allows content critical of Israel to go viral?
TikTok became a battleground for narratives when videos exposing Israeli actions in Gaza went viral. Within weeks, Western politicians—from both major U.S. parties—revived calls to ban the platform. Why now? Because the monopoly over narrative was being broken. Young users, independent journalists, and even eyewitnesses in Palestine could bypass traditional media. For a system that thrives on control, that’s more threatening than any spyware.
Calls to ban TikTok intensified when Palestinian voices started trending. Coincidence again?
Let’s not be naïve. It wasn’t cat videos that triggered bipartisan panic. It was raw footage, personal stories, and user-generated content exposing war crimes, apartheid policies, and resistance movements. Platforms like TikTok provide the last open window for many suppressed voices. When those voices challenge powerful lobbies or allies of the West, the window suddenly "needs regulation." Based on this article, congressional insiders have revealed that the main reason behind the United States' push to ban social media application TikTok is due to Israel’s image rather than fears of Chinese infiltration.
LinkedIn hosts numerous fake profiles posing as Israeli "executives" who use their platform to normalize the occupation. For example, you can see the kind of comments under this post from UNRWA, which is a UN organization that has documented Israel's war crimes, and is now targeted by them to be shut down. The Israel's propaganda machine has joined their legal and political assets to get rid of this humanitarian organization that was founded by the UN in 1949, and legally should remain operational until ALL the Palestinians return to their homes, which is something that Israel never wants to happen.
Example Israeli fake account
A deep dive into LinkedIn reveals a wave of suspicious profiles claiming to be executives or tech leaders, many of whom echo identical narratives: defending Israeli policies, attacking UN agencies, or pushing Ziøn1sts' hasbara propaganda. Most of these accounts are either digital bots or official members of Israel's propaganda machine, created to shape perception and legitimacy. It's a digital form of colonial PR (Public Relations). LinkedIn, meanwhile, has done little to address this. Instead, it keeps banning, suspending, or even deleting accounts critical of the Israeli occupation and its war crimes.
Palestinian-supporting professionals have reported being harassed or mass-reported by these fake/organized accounts. The platform's response? Silence. LinkedIn claims to be a professional network, but it’s increasingly becoming a tool for Zio-supremacy state-sponsored propaganda and harassment.
Numerous professionals—from journalists to activists to humanitarian workers—have faced LinkedIn bans, suspensions, or shadowbans (less visibility and reach, which is what, at least I myself witnessed happen for my posts) for supporting Palestine. Their posts are often mass-reported by coordinated campaigns. The result? Censorship without transparency. A supposedly professional network is being used to blacklist those who stand with human rights and international law.
Censorship
As an example, LinkedIn recently deleted one of my replies to one of these Israeli fake accounts that was spreading hatred towards Palestinians and was saying that "Palestine is NOT their (Palestinians') land". LinkedIn not only kept the comment from that obviously fake Israeli propaganda account, but it also deleted my response to that comment! This is how they silence dissent and protect the narrative of the neo-fascist Ziøn1sts who run the world!
While Zionists are allowed to say whatever they want, under full support of the system, no one is even allowed to reply to their false claims, and if you do, you will be silenced!
The irony. pic.twitter.com/nJGhEFOLSK
— Suppressed News. (@SuppressedNws) May 2, 2025
The Zionist who is now in charge of AI policies basically says that you will be banned if you mention any of the truth about those Zio-supremacist fascists who are running the world and want us all to become their slaves!
Twitter has become a battlefield for cyber-armies aligned with Israeli policy. Organized efforts by Israeli-linked cyber units have flooded Twitter (X) with coordinated campaigns, often involving thousands of bots. Their goal is to drown out pro-Palestinian content, mass-report critics, and manufacture consent for Israeli actions. Elon Musk may have promised more freedom, but what we see is weaponized disinformation cloaked as “community moderation”.
As far as I am aware, Israel uses its own cyber units together with another one that Reza Pahlavi created a couple of decades ago, to influence elections in favour of far-right pro-Israel politicians. (I remember one of his gangsters even publicly proudly mentioned that in the VoA Persian TV, which is kinda owned by Pahlavi's Mafia, which is quite rich and powerful as they have stolen/earned billions of dollars from Iran, and from their dirty businesses mainly in the US and Israel. Remember, more than 250,000 Iranians migrated to Israel about 5 decades ago, before the revolution, because they support Israel's Ashk-e Nazi Aryan "supremacy" ideology!)
For example, Reza Pahlavi, together with his gang and Israel, were the main actors behind brainwashing the society to vote for Trump. They also support Israel's other assets in the US Congress and other countries. Apart from the US, these gangsters have interfered in the elections of many countries, including but not limited to Argentina, Canada, and Germany.
Freedom of targeted hatred
Apparently, you are free to only spread hatred toward Arabs, Muslims, Iranians, Chinese, etc., without being suspended. Compare the moderation: Pro-Israel accounts that incite violence or dehumanize entire populations remain untouched. Meanwhile, if you post about BDS, apartheid, or the siege of Gaza, expect to be flagged. This is not random. It's a policy of selective tolerance—freedom for some, silence for others.
Tweets critical of Ziøn1sm, Israeli policies, or military action often get flagged, shadowbanned, or removed altogether. Yet, tweets promoting violence against Palestinians or inciting hatred toward Arabs and Muslims often remain untouched. This is not a coincidence; it’s a systematic bias that favors one narrative over another.
There’s a clear pattern: critiques of U.S. foreign policy are tolerated to a degree, critiques of China are welcomed, critiques of Russia are encouraged—but critiques of Israel? Suddenly, the rules change. If a "democracy" cannot be criticized, it’s not a democracy. It's a Mafia of powerful Ziøn1sts who are controlling the world through the "modern economy" that they created to get rid of the middle class and to control the world.
Is free speech really free if it only flows one way?
Why the asymmetry? Is free speech really free if it only flows one way? The internet was supposed to be a global equalizer. But now, platforms serve as gatekeepers for narratives aligned with Western geopolitical agendas. When speech is selectively policed, the foundation of democracy crumbles. If freedom of speech is real, it must include the right to challenge sacred cows—especially when those cows are governments wielding military and economic power.
Weaponizing the term “antisemitism”
We have seen that the term "antisemitism" has been weaponized to shut down valid criticism of a state’s actions. If antisemitism should be condemned, Israel should be among the first to be condemned for killing Semites of Palestine and for having inhumanely butchered tens of thousands of Palestinian innocent kids.
Equating criticism of Israel with antisemitism is intellectually dishonest and morally dangerous. It’s a tactic designed to shut down debate and discredit dissent. When human rights abuses are shielded by cries of prejudice, we all lose. Worse, it makes it harder to fight actual antisemitism.
Once the German Nazis silenced dissent, now Ashk-e Nazis are doing the same
Equating political critique with ethnic hatred is a dangerous form of narrative control. Censorship under the banner of "sensitivity" is not new. The Nazis silenced dissent. The Soviets did it. Modern regimes do it. What’s shocking is that the so-called free world is adopting the same tools—only rebranded. Today’s silencer isn’t a boot—it’s a “content policy.” And the result is the same: the truth disappears.
Remember, it was the German Nazis together with the UK, USSR and the US that established "Project Israel" to
continue
Fascism under a new name "Zionism" and to hide behind the fake nice masks of "democracy" and "freedom of speech".
Hitler died, but Fascists didn't! Now people like Shira Anderson are censoring the truth in favor of their
Zio-supremacy ideology. Polish Fascist supremacists like Daniella Weiss are now leading the same hate-based
ideology that Hitler once had. These monsters are counting on the spread of hatred and violence, while they silence
the truth in favor of their false narrative. The international Mafia of Zionists has been brainwashing the whole
world for decades, and now they are enforcing their new world order to enslave the whole world! There will be no
future for your kids as long as you stay silent.
With the money they have laundered for decades, they now own almost everything in the West, including but not limited to almost all US politicians, big corporations that they bought with their "money printing power", the media, and now social media platforms like Facebook, Twitter, and LinkedIn. The world should remember people like Shira Anderson as traitors who limited freedom of speech and equal rights for all humans. They are the ones who are silencing the truth behind the scenes, by the laws, policies, and legislations that they are pushing in favour of their cancer extreme ideology of Zio-supremacism.
Israel should be accountable
We must be able to hold any government/states accountable—Israel included—without being smeared as bigots. Interestingly, Israel acts very similarly to ISIS (which was created by Israel and NATO) and other t3rrorist states that shut down critics. The future of human rights depends on stopping these double standards. If we can’t criticize a Nuclear state with one of the most advanced militaries and decades of occupation under its belt, who can we criticize? The line between truth and hate must be clear. The minute we blur it, demonic power wins—and humanity loses.
Will I choose silence? NO!
As I mentioned earlier here, many Iranians have been silenced by the gang of Zionist fundamentalists who cooperate with Pahlavi's fascists and MEK terrorists. People who speak up are either socially terrorized by these Mafias of mobsters, who have the full support of NSA/CIA after having bribed the majority of US politicians, or eliminated by being accused of made-up stories or other ways like "die in a car accident".
Am I afraid? NO. Will I choose silence? NO! Even if I have to sacrifice my life for the future of humanity and waking up people to stand against these international Mafia of "modern bankers" and Zionists who have established their modern enslaving system that has weakened the middle class and wants everyone either to die or to accept becoming their cheap slaves. We either wake up today, or tomorrow might be too late!
